How can teacher accountability have a positive and a negative influence on the classroom environment?

Question

How can teacher accountability have a positive and a negative influence on the classroom environment?

Answer 1

1

Answer 2

If you want to show your child to read this https://tr.im/PXKX5 could be the easiest way, Children Learning Reading program.

Children Learning Reading is a learning plan that attempts to successfully show children to see in little, digestible 15 minute lessons. Children Learning Reading has a good popularity and is easy to use.

Children Learning Reading contains efficient lessons and examining games for children to help make the understanding method much simpler not just for your son or daughter but also for you. The instructions are easy to follow along with, and the topics are rational and communicate the substance well. If this technique worked for so many parents and children, then there's without doubt about it, it will continue to work for your kids also!

Answer 3

The problem with "teacher accountability" is that teaching is a two-way street. Poor student performance is blamed on teachers, and no one ever talks about STUDENT accountability. Not to mention PARENT accountability! I'm not saying teachers shouldn't be held accountable to some extent for what they teach and how well they teach it. I'm saying that not even the best teacher in the world is going to reach a child who simply chooses not to learn, or whose parents refuse to support the child's learning. It's not fair to place the entire burden of responsibility on only one party in a relationship that should be working three ways. My point is, it really DOES take a village.

Answer 4

State power over education is a tricky issue. Historically, local government has exercised control over U.S. schools across the country, including decisions about school standards and classroom learning content.



But in 2001, Congress signed into federal law the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which reinstated a number of federal programs designed to improve school performance by increasing state, school district, and school standards.



The NCLB is controversial for a number of reasons, upsetting both parents and teachers across the country. Many doubt its effectiveness in actually improving school performance.



Actually the NCLB might even lower states' achievement goals by encouraging teachers to teach learning content solely as preparation for standardized tests.



One 2008 study from the Department of Education concluded that the Reading First Program, a major billion dollar a year NCLB initiative, had proven ineffective.



Here are some articles on this issue:



http://k6educators.about.com/cs/professionaldevel/a/standtests.htm



http://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/volante.html



http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/44978/the_truth_about_teaching_to_standardized.html?cat=4

Answer 5

The positive aspect is that it will push teachers to try harder and work with the children that are struggling,the negative aspect is that some teachers will cheat by giving answers on standardized tests.

Answer 6

While I can't possibly imagine a teacher giving answers to a test (but I'm sure it's happened), a bigger more general problem with teacher accountability is that the teacher naturally places more emphasis on how to pass the test than on the intended curriculum of the course. From a parent's perspective, this means the teachers are "teaching to the test" and only worried about the bonuses that come with good scores. On the flip side, some teachers NEED to have standardized testing to truly hold them accountable. I personally think this means these particular teachers have no business in the business, but either way, it's good to make sure teachers are doing their jobs. From a parent's perspective, it's certainly nice to have concrete numbers about your child's educational progress. Standardized tests do this for them.